Monday, April 28, 2014

The Debasement of Pregnant Women's Bodily Integrity


Most people perceive issues of women’s rights as a problem of the past.  The modern woman is perceived to have all her human rights intact.  After all, women can now vote, work outside of the home, and own property just as men can.  Despite making a bit less than men, women today seem to have it pretty good.  I think almost everyone would agree that women have been empowered throughout the years of progression of the women’s rights movement.   What many people neglect to consider is the undeniable disempowerment a woman experiences when she becomes pregnant.


Being pregnant can be an amazing experience.  Some women wait their whole lives for it and describe it as the happiest time in their lives. As soon as a woman learns she is pregnant, many mothers report a feeling of immediate attachment and love for the fetus. Unfortunately, as soon as the woman announces that she is pregnant she becomes secondary in our society’s eyes.  The main concern shifts toward the growing fetus inside her and keeping it safe, even if that means debasing the mother’s bodily integrity in order to do so.

From the time that women announce they are pregnant they lose their subjectivity.  The fetus becomes empowered and the mother in result is disempowered.  I would argue that this disempowerment happens on both a legal level as well as a cultural level.  Pregnant women are not only surveillanced by almost everyone they come into contact with but they may also be at risk of losing their rights to their body legally as well.

Susan Bordo, author of Unbearable Weight Feminism, Western Culture, and The Body, examines many instances of legal double standards concerning the bodily integrity of pregnant women, cases where women are treated as fetal incubators rather than living, breathing people.  Bordo offers several examples of cases that strip women of their sense of self in order to benefit the fetus (Bordo).  For example doctors kept a brain dead women alive, against her husbands wishes, in order for the fetus she was carrying to continue to develop until it could live separately from the mother.  In this case the mother was mistreated and denied her wishes concerning life support because of the fetus growing inside her.  Essentially the fetus was determined to be more important than the mother’s basic human rights.  Another extremely eye opening case is Angela Carder’s case from 1987. When Carder was twenty-six weeks pregnant doctors discovered her cancer, which was thought to be in remission, had recurred and metastasized to her lungs.  The doctors at George Washington University Hospital in Washington, D.C. did not agree with Carder’s wishes to undergo chemo and radiation, putting her own life ahead of the life of her unborn baby’s.  The hospital did not treat her cancer and pushed for her to have an immediate C-section (before she died).  Even though it was against Angela and her husband’s wishes and would likely end Angela’s life, the immediate C-section was authorized.  The baby died shortly after the surgery and Angela died two days later. 

Although it is hard to hear such an upsetting story it is also extremely important to open people’s eyes to the injustices pregnant women face in western culture.  Some may disregard these cases as extreme and rare but the reality is, pregnant women rarely enjoy the same rights they did prior to their pregnancy.  Even without forced C-sections or legal matters, pregnant women are surveillanced everyday by everyone around them.  Mothers have to meet a strict set of cultural expectations while they are pregnant or they will be seen as bad mothers.

Mothers are immediately looked down upon if they engage in any activity that could put the health of the fetus in jeopardy.  Our society essentially expects a woman to make herself the second priority for the rest of her life after she gets pregnant.  A pregnant woman is constantly questioned whether her actions are safe for the baby. Everything a woman does when she is pregnant is brought into question.  If she is exercising, is she exercising too much?  If she is dieting, is she denying the baby proper nutrition?  These basic private entities of a person’s life become public when you are pregnant. In our society a bump under your shirt gives all onlookers an invitation to judge you based on your caffeine intake or whether or not you drink a glass of wine with dinner.  In one particular case, Jane Hampson, a 37 year old pregnant woman, was actually refused a small glass of red wine because the bartender "didn't want it on his conscience".  Not to mention, all personal space and touching barriers are erased when a curious passerby sees a belly bump. 

Fetal rights have exploded into a national obsession.  What makes this problematic is not that the fetus is being treated like a person with rights, but rather that the fetus is stealing the rights of the mother.  Although some believe that the fetus is a living being at the point of conception, it is still living off of another human’s body.  Therefore any rights that may be given to the fetus must not be at the expense of the mother’s bodily integrity.  We would never force a refusing son to donate bone marrow to save his dying mother even if he was the only direct match.  So a mother should never be forced into a C-section to save the life of her struggling unborn son.  By empowering the fetus and providing it with human rights, our culture has stripped pregnant women of their basic human rights and bodily integrity.






Works Cited
Bordo, Susan. "Are Mothers Persons." Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: U of California, 1993. N. pag. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment